Ferguson v. Nissen Staffing Continuum Inc et al
Tyrone Ferguson, Sr |
Nissen Staffing Continuum Inc and BuySeasons |
2:2017cv00198 |
February 14, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Milwaukee |
Pamela Pepper |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 4/30/2018. Case DISMISSED for lack of diligence under Civil L.R. 41(c) (ED Wis.). (cc: all counsel, via mail to Tyrone Ferguson)(cb) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 3/27/2018. 14 Defendant Nissen Staffing Continuum's motion to dismiss GRANTED. 20 Defendant BuySeason's motion to dismiss GRANTED to the extent that it is based on failure to state a claim and fai lure to seek relief against the defendant. By end of day 4/27/2018 plaintiff must file amended complaint if he wishes to proceed on claims of race and age discrimination under Title VII; failure to file will result in dismissal for failure to diligently prosecute. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Tyrone Ferguson--with EDWI guide and non-prisoner complaint form) (cb) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 2/23/2017 GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's motion to proceed without paying the filing fee and SCREENING 1 the Complaint. (cc: all counsel; by US Mail to plaintiff) (pwm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.