Redman v. Doehling et al
Richard Redman |
L Doehling and Christine Dietrich |
2:2017cv00239 |
February 22, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Waushara |
David E Jones |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 12/19/2017: GRANTING 27 Defendant Lori Doehling's Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING 24 Defendant Christine Dietrich's Motion to Seal; GRANTING 34 Defendant Christine Dietrich's Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING as moot 44 Plaintiff's Fourth Motion to Appoint Counsel; and DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Richard Redman at Redgranite Correctional Institution) (jm) |
Filing 43 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 10/12/2017 DENYING 40 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants' Summary Judgment Motions or to Hold Them in Abeyance. Plaintiff to respond to 27 and 34 Defendants' Summary Judgment Motions by 11/20/2017; no further extensions will be considered. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Richard Redman at Redgranite Correctional Institution) (jm) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 8/14/2017 DENYING without prejudice 18 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Second Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Richard H. Redman at Redgranite Correctional Institution) (jm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.