Bergeron Davila v. Teeling et al
Raymond J Bergeron Davila |
Barbara A Teeling, Anthony Lacombe, John Does and Sergeant Doe |
2:2017cv00521 |
April 11, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Columbia |
J P Stadtmueller |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 12/21/2017: GRANTING 20 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING 23 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss; and DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Raymond J. Bergeron Davila at Waupun Correctional Institution) (jm) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 5/23/2017 GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. Plaintiff PERMITTED to proceed against all Defendants on claims of: excessive force and failure to intervene to protect, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and intentionally treating Plaintiff differently than other similarly situated persons, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. U.S. Marshals Service DIRECTED to serve a copy of the Compl aint and this Order on Defendants; Defendants to file responsive pleading to the Complaint. Agency having custody of Plaintiff to collect balance of filing fee from his prison trust account. See Order for further details. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Raymond J. Bergeron Davila and Warden at Columbia Correctional Institution) (jm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.