Liddell v. Racine County Clerk of Courts et al
| Anthony Liddell, Jr |
| Racine County Clerk of Courts, State of Wisconsin, Circuit Court Access Data Base and Department of Corrections |
| 2:2017cv00565 |
| April 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Racine |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 10/20/2017: GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee; DENYING as moot 8 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Pay Initial Partial Filing Fee; DENYING 6 and 10 Plaintiff's Motions to Appoint Counsel; DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim; DIRECTING Clerk of Court to document that this inmate has incurred a "s trike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); ORDERING agency having custody of Plaintiff to collect the balance of the filing fee from Plaintiff's institution trust account in accordance with this Order; and CERTIFYING that any appeal from this m atter would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) unless Plaintiff offers bona fide arguments supporting his appeal. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Anthony Liddell, Jr. and Warden at Dodge Correctional Institution) (jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
