Adams v. Hepp
Petitioner: Paul Allen Adams
Respondent: Randall Hepp
Case Number: 2:2017cv00713
Filed: May 22, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Dodge
Presiding Judge: William E Duffin
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 10/30/2017: GRANTING 27 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 1 Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; DENYING a certificate of appealability; and DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Paul Allen Adams at Fox Lake Correctional Institution) (jm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. Hepp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Paul Allen Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Randall Hepp
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?