BMO Harris Bank NA v. Old Republic Insurance Company et al
| BMO Harris Bank NA |
| Old Republic Insurance Company and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| 2:2017cv00772 |
| June 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 9/27/2018. 49 Defendant Old Republic Insurance Company's Motion to Supplement the Record is GRANTED. 15 Defendant Old Republic Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. 40 , 46 , 50 and 55 Parties' Motions to Seal/Restrict Documents are GRANTED. CASE STAYED until further order of the Court. See Order for further details. (cc: all counsel)(jm)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 8/4/2017 GRANTING 12 Defendant FDIC's Motion to Stay. Action STAYED until earlier of: 2/5/2018 or 10 days after FDIC issues notice of disposition of any administrative claim BMO files before the claims bar date. See Order. (cc: all counsel) (jm)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 6/21/2017: GRANTING 9 Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Expedited Motion to Stay; STAYING matter through 8/3/2017; and VACATING Scheduling Conference set for 6/27/2017. See Order. (cc: all counsel)(jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
