Wilkinson v. Dumas

Wilkinson v. Dumas

Petitioner:	Eddie Wilkinson
Respondent:	Tim Dumas
Case Number:	2:2017cv00845
Filed:	June 16, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office:	Milwaukee Office
County:	Juneau
Presiding Judge:	Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 12, 2018	Filing 25 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 03/09/2018. IT IS ORDERED that Wilkinsons petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment. Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, I find that the petitioner has not made the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), and therefore I will not issue a certificate of appealability. FURTHER ORDERED that Wilkinsons motion to appoint counsel 12 is DENIED on the ground that he has not sh own that he made a reasonable attempt to secure counsel on his own, and also because I find that Wilkinson appeared to be capable of litigating this case on his own. FURTHER ORDERED that Wilkinsons motion requesting good cause being shown 19 is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Wilkinsons motions to supplement the record 21 , 22 and 23 are DENIED. (cc: all counsel, Petitioner) (lls)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 12, 2018

Filing 25 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 03/09/2018. IT IS ORDERED that Wilkinsons petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment. Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, I find that the petitioner has not made the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), and therefore I will not issue a certificate of appealability. FURTHER ORDERED that Wilkinsons motion to appoint counsel 12 is DENIED on the ground that he has not sh own that he made a reasonable attempt to secure counsel on his own, and also because I find that Wilkinson appeared to be capable of litigating this case on his own. FURTHER ORDERED that Wilkinsons motion requesting good cause being shown 19 is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Wilkinsons motions to supplement the record 21 , 22 and 23 are DENIED. (cc: all counsel, Petitioner) (lls)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilkinson v. Dumas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Eddie Wilkinson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Tim Dumas
Represented By:	Daniel J O'Brien
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?