Kyles v. Charney et al
| Elliott G Kyles |
| Beau Charney, Silva Escalante and Jeremy Nelson |
| 2:2017cv01102 |
| August 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Brown |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 5/8/2018. Case DISMISSED under 28 USC §§1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a federal claim, because plaintiff's federal claim is frivolous and because the court can not exercise jurisdiction over plaintiff's state-law claim. Clerk of Court to document that plaintiff has incurred a "strike" under 28 USC §1915(g). (cc: all counsel, via mail to Elliott Kyles and Warden at Dodge Correctional Institution; Corey Finkelmeyer-Asst. Atty General)(cb)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 2/2/2018 DENYING as moot 7 plaintiff's motion for extension of time to pay initial partial filing fee; GRANTING 2 plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Plai ntiff may file amended complaint by 3/2/2018. Agency having custody of plaintiff shall collect $347.23 balance of filing fee from plaintiff's prison trust account under 28 USC §1915(b)(2). (cc: all counsel, via mail to Elliott Kyles-with EDWI prisoner complaint form; Brown County Sheriff) (cb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
