Northridge National Laboratory v. Schneider National Inc et al
Northridge National Laboratory |
Schneider National Inc, Schneider National Carriers Inc and ABC Corporation |
2:2017cv01174 |
August 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Milwaukee |
Pamela Pepper |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 Court Minutes and Order from Oral Argument held 3/24/21 before Judge Brett Ludwig denying subject to conditions 37 Motion to Quash; denying 26 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony; denying 29 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying in part 33 Motion Summary Judgment. Plaintiff brief due 4/23/21; Defendant Response due 5/14/21; Reply due 5/28/21. Limited Discovery due 5/14/21. Parties status report due 4/23/21. (Tape #10:02 - 11:08.) (MP) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 6/11/2019. 19 Defendant's motion to amend answer GRANTED as to 13th affirmative defense (standing) and DENIED without prejudice as to 14th affirmative defense (fraud). Defendant to file amended answer by 6/26/2019. 23 Defendant's unopposed motion to amend scheduling order GRANTED. Discovery now due 7/18/2019; dispositive motions now due 8/22/2019. If the parties choose not to file dispositive motions, they should file joint status report by 8/22/2019. (cc: all counsel)(cb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.