Norwood v. Bergh et al
Jor-El Tristen Norwood |
Zachary Bergh, Officer Vetsch and Officer Sullivan |
2:2017cv01334 |
September 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Brown |
Nancy Joseph |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 1/18/19. The Court will attempt to recruit counsel for the limited purpose of representing Norwood at the final pretrial conference and trial. The telephone conference scheduled for 1/18/19 at 3:00 pm is CANCELLED. Once counsel is appointed, the Clerk is to place the matter on the court's calendar for a telephone conference to address further scheduling. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Jor-El Tristen Norwood)(Griesbach, William) |
Filing 78 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 66 Motion for Leave to File; granting 74 Motion for Leave to File. The Clerk is directed to set this matter on the courts calendar for a telephone scheduling conference. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Norwood) (Griesbach, William) |
Filing 32 ORDER DENYING 31 MOTION to Compel, filed by Jor-El Tristen Norwood, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 12-21-2017. See order for full detail. (cc: all counsel, Norwood via U.S. Mail)(Griesbach, William) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.