Lebich v. Conard et al
Travis James Lebich |
CO Conard, CO Nietzel, Robert Humpreys and Tom Pollard |
2:2017cv01490 |
October 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Sheboygan |
J P Stadtmueller |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 9/7/2018: GRANTING 19 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 26 Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss; and DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Travis James Lebich at Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution) (jm) |
Filing 7 SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 12/5/2017. 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee GRANTED. Defendants Robert Humphreys and Tom Pollard DISMISSED from action. Plaintiff PERMITTED to proceed on the following claim: cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, against Defendants C.O. Conard and C.O. Nietzel. Copies of Plaintiff's Complaint and this Order to be electronically SENT to DOJ for service on Defendants, who shall respond to the Complaint within 60 days. Agency having custody of Plaintiff to COLLECT balance of filing fee from his institution trust account in accordance with this Order. See Order for further details. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Travis James Lebich and Warden at Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution)(jm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.