Balsewicz v. Kemper et al
| Douglas Balsewicz |
| Paul Kemper, Lora Blasius, Ms Vasquez, Sue Nygren, A Hiltunen, Laura Frazier, Brenda LaBelle, James LaBelle and John and Jane Doe |
| 2:2017cv01568 |
| November 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Racine |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 7/24/2020 GRANTING 48 defendants' motion for summary judgment. Case DISMISSED under Civil Local Rule 7(d) for plaintiff's failure to respond to defendants' motion. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Douglas Balsewicz at Racine Correctional Institution)(cb)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 6/19/2018. 2 Plaintiff's MOTION for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee DENIED as moot. 9 Plaintiff's MOTION to use funds from release account to pay filing fees DENIED as moot. [ 3] Plaintiff's MOTION to appoint counsel DENIED without prejudice. Defendants John and Jane Doe DISMISSED. Remaining defendants to file responsive pleading to complaint within 60 days. Parties may not begin discovery until the court enters scheduling order setting deadlines for discovery and dispositive motions. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Douglas Balsewicz at Racine Correctional Institution)(cb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
