Al v. Van Ru Credit Corporation
Deborah Al |
Van Ru Credit Corporation |
2:2017cv01738 |
December 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Milwaukee |
J P Stadtmueller |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 1/14/2019. 41 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and 42 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 48 , 57 , 60 and 61 Parties' Motions to Seal Documents are GRANTED. See Order for further details. (cc: all counsel) (jm) |
Filing 66 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 9/25/2018. 3 Plantiff's First Motion to Certify Class, To Stay, and For Relief from Briefing Requirements is DENIED as moot. 23 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Certify Class is DENIED as moot. 29 Plaintiff's Third Motion to Certify Class is GRANTED. The specified class is CERTIFIED; Plaintiff is APPOINTED as class representative and her counsel are APPOINTED as class counsel. 27 , 32 , and 51 Plaintiff's Motions to S eal Documents related to class certification briefing are GRANTED. 49 Plaintiff's Motion Seeking the Court's Ruling on Class Certification Prior to Ruling on Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 41 and 42 Parties' Motions for Sum mary Judgment and 48 , 57 60 and 61 Related Motions to Seal Documents are STAYED pending further order of the Court. Parties are ORDERED to confer and file a stipulation addressing issues identified within 14 days. See Order for further details. (cc: all counsel) (jm) |
Filing 36 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 7/18/2018 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 33 Plaintiff's Expedited Motion to Compel. See Order. (cc: all counsel) (jm) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 4/26/2018 DENYING 9 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. (cc: all counsel) (jm) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 3/15/2018. Within 10 days, Plaintiff to provide evidence of service or explain why good cause exists to extend the Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) service deadline; failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice. (cc: all counsel)(jm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Al v. Van Ru Credit Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deborah Al | |
Represented By: | John D Blythin |
Represented By: | Mark A Eldridge |
Represented By: | Jesse Fruchter |
Represented By: | Ben J Slatky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Van Ru Credit Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.