Vanpietersom v. Peterson et al
| Matthew T Vanpietersom |
| Sgt Peterson and HSU Provider |
| 2:2018cv00060 |
| January 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Dodge |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 8/30/2018: GRANTING 14 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Matthew T. Vanpietersom at Waupun Correctional Institution) (jm)
|
|
Filing
8
SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 2/16/2018. 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee GRANTED. Defendant HSU Provider DISMISSED from action. Plaintiff PERMITTED to proceed on claim o f deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, against Defendant Sgt. Peterson. Copies of Plaintiff's Complaint and this Order to be electronically SENT to Wisconsin DOJ for service on Defendant, who sh all FILE a responsive pleading within 60 days. Agency having custody of Plaintiff to COLLECT the balance of the filing fee from his institution trust account in accordance with this Order. See Order for further details. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Matthew T. Vanpietersom and Warden at Waupun Correctional Institution) (jm) Modified on 2/16/2018 (jm).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
