Harwick v. Rozmarynoski et al
| Dustin Harwick |
| Tonia Rozmarynoski, Scott Eckstein and Alan DeGroot |
| 2:2018cv00145 |
| January 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Brown |
| David E Jones |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Harwick's motion to dismiss (Docket # 68 ) is GRANTED IN PART. Harwick's case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. (cc: all counsel, via US Mail to Plaintiff) (ds)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Harwick's motion to compel (Docket # 40 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Harwick's motion to clarify (Docket # 45 ) is DENIED. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that Harw ick's motion for an extension of time to conduct discovery (Docket # 47 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Harwick's motion to set aside the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket # 63 ) is DENIED. IT IS ALSO ORDERED th at Harwick's motion for an extension of time, substitution, and settlement (Docket # 55 ) is GRANTED to the extent that he has until December 27, 2019 to file a response to the defendants' motion for summary judgment and, if he finds it appropriate, to file his own motion for summary judgment. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff) (asc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
