Zdroik v. Reimann et al
Robert A Zdroik |
Marla Reimann, Tina Hose, Bonnie Crabtree, Daniel Hekman, Shaune Hoban, Prapti Kuber, Farhat Khan and Richard Fuller |
2:2018cv00244 |
February 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Lincoln |
J P Stadtmueller |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 9/19/2018: ADOPTING 75 Parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal; DISMISSING CASE with prejudice and without costs; and DENYING as moot 57 and 62 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss or to Sever and Transfer. (cc: all counsel)(jm) |
Filing 71 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 8/24/2018 GRANTING 59 Defendant Tina Hose's Motion for an Order Permitting Ex Parte Communications with Plaintiff's Medical Providers. (cc: all counsel) (jm) |
Filing 54 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 5/31/2018. 43 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED; the Second Amended Complaint (Docket #43-1) shall become the OPERATIVE pleading. Defendants to FILE a re sponsive pleading within 21 days of entry of this Order. 37 Defendant Tina Hose's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. 29 Defendant Marla Reimann and Lincoln County's Motion to Drop or Sever is DENIED as moot. See Order. (cc: all counsel) (jm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.