Magritz v. Litscher

Magritz v. Litscher

Petitioner:	Steven Alan Magritz
Respondent:	Jon E Litscher
Case Number:	2:2018cv00455
Filed:	March 22, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office:	Milwaukee Office
County:	Waukesha
Presiding Judge:	Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 28, 2018	Filing 16 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 11/28/18. IT IS ORDERED that the respondent's motion to dismiss the petition is GRANTED and that the petitioner's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (cc: all counsel, petitioner) (jad)
March 30, 2018	Filing 3 IT IS ORDERED that within 60 days of the date of this order respondent either answer the petition, complying with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, or file a dispositive motion. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall abide by the follo wing schedule regarding the filing of briefs on the merits of petitioners claims: (1) petitioner shall have 45 days following the filing of respondents answer within which to file his brief in support of his petition; (2) respondent shall have 45 day s following the filing of petitioners initial brief within which to file a brief in opposition; and (3) petitioner shall have 30 days following the filing of respondents opposition brief within which to file a reply brief, if any. Signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 03/29/2018. (cc: all counsel, petitioner)(lls)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 28, 2018

Filing 16 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 11/28/18. IT IS ORDERED that the respondent's motion to dismiss the petition is GRANTED and that the petitioner's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (cc: all counsel, petitioner) (jad)

March 30, 2018

Filing 3 IT IS ORDERED that within 60 days of the date of this order respondent either answer the petition, complying with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, or file a dispositive motion. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall abide by the follo wing schedule regarding the filing of briefs on the merits of petitioners claims: (1) petitioner shall have 45 days following the filing of respondents answer within which to file his brief in support of his petition; (2) respondent shall have 45 day s following the filing of petitioners initial brief within which to file a brief in opposition; and (3) petitioner shall have 30 days following the filing of respondents opposition brief within which to file a reply brief, if any. Signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 03/29/2018. (cc: all counsel, petitioner)(lls)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Magritz v. Litscher
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven Alan Magritz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Jon E Litscher
Represented By:	Daniel J O'Brien
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?