Rodriguez v. Hoffemen
Plaintiff: Marlena JD Rodriguez
Defendant: Ms Hoffemen
Case Number: 2:2018cv00475
Filed: March 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Fond du Lac
Presiding Judge: David E Jones
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 1/3/2019. 21 Defendant's motion for summary judgment GRANTED. 25 Plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss case GRANTED. Case DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Marlena Rodriguez at Taycheedah Correctional Institution)(cb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Hoffemen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marlena JD Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ms Hoffemen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?