Doe v. Milwaukee County et al
| John Doe |
| Milwaukee County, Milwaukee County Behavioral Health Division and Lora Dooley |
| 2:2018cv00503 |
| March 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Milwaukee |
| William E Duffin |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 12/11/2018. The defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 27 ) is granted and this action is dismissed. Count One of Clark's amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice, while Counts Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, and Seven are dismissed without prejudice. (cc: all counsel) (mlm)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 8/7/2018. The defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 14 ) is granted as to Dr. Clark's due process violation claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff may file an amended complaint. Any amended complaint must be filed within 14 days of the date of this order. If the plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint by this deadline, the court will dismiss this action. (cc: all counsel) (mlm)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 7/18/2018. The plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym (ECF No. 9 ) is denied. (cc: all counsel) (mlm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
