Richmond v. Savey et al
Sterling Richmond |
Dr Savey, Dr Murphy and Dr Grossmen |
2:2018cv00530 |
April 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Winnebago |
J P Stadtmueller |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motions for summary judgment(Docket #23, #29) be and the same are hereby GRANTED; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action be and the same is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff) (asc) |
Filing 8 SCREENING ORDER re 1 Complaint signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 5/3/2018. 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee GRANTED. Defendants Edward Walls, Judy Smith, and D. Foster DISMISSED from a ction. Plaintiff PERMITTED to proceed on a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, against Defendants Dr. Sauvey, Dr. Murphy, and Dr. Grossman. Copies of this Order and Plaintiff's Com plaint to be electronically SENT to the Wisconsin DOJ for service on such defendants, who shall FILE a responsive pleading within 60 days. Agency having custody of Plaintiff to COLLECT the balance of the filing fee from his institution trust account in accordance with this Order. See Order for further details. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Sterling Richmond and Warden at Oshkosh Correctional Institution)(jm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.