Stephens v. Tegels
Petitioner: Mark A Stephens
Respondent: Lizzie Tegels
Case Number: 2:2018cv00534
Filed: April 4, 2018
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RECOMMENDATION ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF No. 1 ) signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 4/16/2018. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Stephens's petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a certificate of appealability be denied. Case reassigned to Judge Lynn Adelman for Order. (cc: all counsel, petitioner via USPS)(mlm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stephens v. Tegels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark A Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lizzie Tegels
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?