Gill v. Aramark et al
Plaintiff: Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant: Aramark Correctional Services, Thomas Hare, Outagamie County Jail, Lt Nerheyen, Jenny Doe and Michelle Hare
Case Number: 2:2018cv00540
Filed: April 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Outagamie
Presiding Judge: Pamela Pepper
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 11/19/2020 DENYING 101 plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. (cc: all counsel and mailed to Charles Gill at Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution)(cb)
September 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/5/2018. 2 Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of filing fee GRANTED; agency having custody of plaintiff to collect $348.98 balance of filing fee from plaintiff's prison trust account under 28 USC §1915(b)(2). 7 Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to pay filing fee DENIED as moot. 10 Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction DENIED. Defendant Outagamie County Jail DISMISSED. Plaintiff to file amended complaint by 10/12/2018. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Charles Gill (with copy of EDWI complaint form) and Warden at Dodge Correctional Institution)(cb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gill v. Aramark et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles B Gill, Sr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Correctional Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Hare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Outagamie County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt Nerheyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jenny Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle Hare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?