Dynamic Intl of Wisconsin Inc v. SMEC Co Ltd

Plaintiff: Dynamic Intl of Wisconsin Inc
Defendant: SMEC Co Ltd
Case Number: 2:2018cv00582
Filed: April 12, 2018
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Waukesha
Presiding Judge: Pamela Pepper
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 18, 2018 28 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 10/18/2018 DENYING without prejudice 24 Plaintiff's Rule 7(h) Expedited, Non-Dispositive Motion to Stay Arbitration Proceedings Pending Disposition of Parties' Competing Motions. (cc: all counsel) (cb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dynamic Intl of Wisconsin Inc v. SMEC Co Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dynamic Intl of Wisconsin Inc
Represented By: James B Barton
Represented By: Bryan Joseph Cecil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SMEC Co Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?