Urquhart v. Roeseler et al
| Bryan Urquhart |
| Cory Roeseler and Advanced Correctional Healthcare |
| 2:2018cv00879 |
| June 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Dodge |
| William E Duffin |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 9/11/2019: GRANTING 43 Defendant Advanced Correctional Healthcare's Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING 49 Defendant Cory Roeseler's Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING as moot 26 Defendant Cory Roeseler's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; and DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Bryan Urquhart at Fox Lake Correctional Institution) (jm)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 3/4/2019. 30 Plaintiff's Motion for In Camera Review of Health Records is DENIED; within 10 days, Plaintiff to produce to Defendant ACH signed authorization forms for the release of his health records. 29 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED without prejudice. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Bryan Urquhart at Fox Lake Correctional Institution) (jm)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 1/15/2019: DENYING without prejudice 23 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel and DENYING 24 Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Bryan Urquhart at Fox Lake Correctional Institution) (jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
