Delglyn v. Peck
James CNG Delglyn |
James M. Peck, CEO d/b/a Transunion, LLC and James M Peck |
2:2018cv01076 |
July 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Milwaukee |
Nancy Joseph |
J P Stadtmueller |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge J. P. Stadtmueller: Scheduling Conference held on 9/7/2018 (Court Reporter Sheryl Stawski) (km) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine E Carlton Robinson on behalf of James M Peck. Attorney(s) appearing: Katherine E. Carlton Robinson (Carlton Robinson, Katherine) |
Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Plan by James M Peck. (Rang, Laura) |
Filing 12 LETTER from plaintiff re disclosures. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Statement of Claim, #2 Affidavit Statement of Proof, #3 Loan Application Information)(asc) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by James M Peck. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rang, Laura) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to AMENDED Complaint (Amended) by James M Peck.(Rang, Laura) Modified on 8/14/2018 (asc). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference set for 9/7/2018 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 425, 517 E. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI before Judge J.P. Stadtmueller. Joint Rule 26 Plan due by 9/4/2018. (cc: all counsel, via mail to James CNG Delglyn)(jm) |
Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by James CNG Delglyn. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (blr) |
Filing 7 AMENDED DOCUMENT by James M Peck. Amended Notice Of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - James Peck, C.E.O. d/b/a Transunion, LLC's Notice Of Filing Notice Of Removal, #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Amended Summons And Complaint To James Peck, C.E.O. d/b/a Transunion, LLC)(Rang, Laura) |
Case reassigned to Judge J P Stadtmueller. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph no longer assigned to the case. (blr) |
Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by James M Peck. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Rang, Laura) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint And Affirmative Defenses by James M Peck.(Rang, Laura) |
Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days (jcl) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by James M. Peck, CEO d/b/a Transunion, LLC. (Rang, Laura) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura K Rang on behalf of James M. Peck, CEO d/b/a Transunion, LLC. Attorney(s) appearing: Laura K. Rang (Rang, Laura) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by James M. Peck, CEO d/b/a Transunion, LLC from Circuit Court of Milwaukee County, Case Number: 18SC019964 with attached state court documents. (Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-2875434) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons To Trans Union, LLC, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint To Trans Union, LLC, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rang, Laura) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.