Bester v. Jomela Properties
| Mary Jane Bester |
| Jomela Properties |
| 2:2018cv01275 |
| August 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Milwaukee |
| Lynn Adelman |
| William E Duffin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk on 9/17/18. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff)(jad) |
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/15/18. IT IS ORDERED that the magistrate judge's reports and recommendations in Cases 18-C-1275, 18-C-1295, and 18-C-1302 are ACCEPTED and those cases are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Cases 18-C-1349, 18-C-1350, 18-C-1369, 18-C-1370, 18-C-1390, and 18-C-1391 are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee in each of these cases is GRANTED. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff)(jad)
|
| Filing 7 OBJECTIONS by Mary Jane Bester re #6 Order,, Case Assigned/Reassigned,. (jcl) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 8/23/2018. The Judgment (ECF No. #5 ) previously entered in this action is vacated. The order (ECF No. #4 ) signed on August 21, 2018 shall be construed as a recommendation for dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. Case reassigned to Judge Lynn Adelman. Judge Magistrate Judge William E Duffin no longer assigned to the case. (cc: all counsel, to plaintiff via USPS)(mlm)
|
|
Filing 5
VACATED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER #6 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk and approved by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 8/21/2018, in favor of Jomela Properties and against Mary Jane Bester. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff via USPS)(mlm)
|
|
Filing 4
RECOMMENDATION ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 8/21/2018. The plaintiff's Request to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying the Filing Fee (ECF No. #2 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Bester's complaint and this action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff via USPS) (mlm)
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Mary Jane Bester. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (mlm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Mary Jane Bester. (mlm) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Jomela Properties filed by Mary Jane Bester. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin. Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(mlm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bester v. Jomela Properties | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary Jane Bester | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jomela Properties | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
