Grant v. Berryhill
Cheryl Grant |
Nancy A Berryhill and Nancy Berryhill |
2:2018cv01304 |
August 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Pamela Pepper |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Notice of Filing Administrative Transcript and Preservation of Rights filed by Nancy Berryhill. (Attachments: #1 Transcript, #2 Transcript, #3 Transcript, #4 Transcript, #5 Transcript, #6 Transcript, #7 Transcript, #8 Transcript, #9 Transcript, #10 Transcript, #11 Transcript, #12 Transcript, #13 Transcript, #14 Transcript, #15 Transcript, #16 Transcript, #17 Transcript, #18 Transcript, #19 Transcript, #20 Transcript, #21 Transcript, #22 Transcript, #23 Transcript, #24 Transcript, #25 Transcript, #26 Transcript, #27 Transcript, #28 Transcript, #29 Transcript, #30 Transcript, #31 Transcript, #32 Transcript, #33 Transcript, #34 Transcript, #35 Transcript, #36 Transcript, #37 Transcript, #38 Transcript, #39 Transcript, #40 Transcript, #41 Transcript, #42 Transcript, #43 Transcript, #44 Transcript, #45 Transcript, #46 Transcript, #47 Transcript, #48 Transcript, #49 Transcript, #50 Transcript, #51 Transcript, #52 Transcript, #53 Transcript, #54 Transcript, #55 Transcript, #56 Transcript, #57 Transcript, #58 Transcript, #59 Transcript, #60 Transcript, #61 Transcript, #62 Transcript, #63 Transcript, #64 Transcript, #65 Transcript, #66 Transcript, #67 Transcript, #68 Transcript, #69 Transcript, #70 Transcript, #71 Transcript, #72 Transcript) (Pawlak, Brian) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Social Security Transcript by Nancy Berryhill (Pawlak, Brian) |
Filing 9 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 9/5/2018. (blr) |
Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Nancy Berryhill. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
Filing 7 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/4/2018. (blr) |
Filing 6 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties. By 10/29/2018 defendant to file and serve certified administrative record. Plaintiff's brief due 12/10/2018; defendant's response due 1/21/2019; plaintiff's reply due 2/5/2019. (cc: all counsel) (cb) |
Transmit #1 Complaint and #5 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 8/28/2018 GRANTING #3 plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of filing fee. (cc: all counsel) (cb) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Cheryl Grant. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Dreis, David) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Cheryl Grant. (Dreis, David) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Cheryl Grant. (Dreis, David) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Cheryl Grant (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dreis, David) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (bx) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.