Spaeth v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Robert E Spaeth
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2018cv01332
Filed: August 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: David E Jones
Referring Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2018 Filing 10 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiff's brief due December 26, 2018; Defendant's response due February 4, 2019; Plaintiff's reply due February 19, 2019. (cc: all counsel) (blr)
September 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 9/12/2018. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge David E. Jones for all further proceedings. Judge J.P. Stadtmueller no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(jm)
September 12, 2018 Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Robert E Spaeth. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Fleming, Michael)
September 10, 2018 Filing 7 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/7/2018. (blr)
September 10, 2018 Filing 6 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 9/7/2018. (blr)
September 4, 2018 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Nancy A Berryhill. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
August 31, 2018 Transmit #1 Complaint and #4 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 8/30/2018 GRANTING #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel) (jm)
August 29, 2018 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Robert E Spaeth. (Fleming, Michael)
August 29, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Robert E Spaeth. (Fleming, Michael)
August 29, 2018 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Robert E Spaeth (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fleming, Michael)
August 29, 2018 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge J P Stadtmueller ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Jones to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spaeth v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert E Spaeth
Represented By: Michael W Fleming
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?