Thunder v. Brown County HSU
| James David Thunder |
| Brown County HSU |
| 2:2018cv01365 |
| September 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/22/18. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee #2 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before November 21, 2018, plaintiff may file an amended complaint curing the defects in the original complaint as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having custody of plaintiff shall collect from his institution trust account the $350 filing fee by collecting monthly payments from plaintiff's prison trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month's income credited to plaintiffs trust account and forwarding payments to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that a copy of this order be sent to the officer in charge of the agency where plaintiff is confined. (cc: all counsel, financial, jail admin, plaintiff) (jad)
|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by James David Thunder. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (jcl) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/12/18. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(4), the plaintiff will not be required to pay an initial partial filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if he wishes to voluntarily dismiss this action to avoid the possibility of incurring a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), the plaintiff shall so notify the court within 21 days of the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of this order be sent to the administrator of the Brown County Jail. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff, jail admin)(jad) Modified on 9/12/2018 (jad).
|
| Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days (jcl) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by James David Thunder. (jcl) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by James David Thunder. (jcl) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against Brown County HSU by James David Thunder. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thunder v. Brown County HSU | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brown County HSU | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James David Thunder | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
