Bartz v. Frost-Arnett Company
Crystal Bartz |
Frost-Arnett Company |
2:2018cv01420 |
September 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Pamela Pepper |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand against Frost-Arnett Company filed by Crystal Bartz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from defendant to plaintiff, #2 Exhibit B: letter from defendant to Plaintiff)(Blythin, John) |
Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/12/2018 re #3 Plaintiff's Rule 7(h) Expedited, Non-Dispositive Motion for Class Certification and Relief from Memorandum, Supporting Documents, and Automatic Briefing Requirements. The court GRANTS the plaintiff's motion to stay the class certification motion until such time as the plaintiff files an amended motion for class certification. The court further GRANTS the plaintiff's motion asking for relief from the automatic briefing schedule required by the local rules for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Note: there is no document associated with this text only order. (cc: all counsel) (cb) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Crystal Bartz. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from memorandum, supporting documents, and automatic briefing requirements, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion for class certification until the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference by Crystal Bartz. (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Crystal Bartz. (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Frost-Arnett Company by Crystal Bartz. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-2918176) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit B: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Eldridge, Mark) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (cms) |
Summons Issued as to Frost-Arnett Company. (lz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bartz v. Frost-Arnett Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Crystal Bartz | |
Represented By: | Ben J Slatky |
Represented By: | John D Blythin |
Represented By: | Jesse Fruchter |
Represented By: | Mark A Eldridge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Frost-Arnett Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.