Bester v. Walmart.com et al
| Mary Jane Bester |
| Walmart and Walmart.com |
| 2:2018cv01460 |
| September 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| David E Jones |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 OBJECTIONS by Mary Jane Bester re #4 Report and Recommendations,,, Case Assigned/Reassigned,,. (jcl) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION signed by Magistrate Judge David E Jones on 11/7/18. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Ms. Bester's Non-Prisoner Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Filing Fee, ECF No. #2 , be DENIED as moot and that the Clerk shall enter judgment that Ms. Bester shall take nothing from the Complaint. Case Reassigned to Judge Lynn Adelman. Judge Magistrate Judge David E Jones no longer assigned to the case. (cc: all counsel - via US Mail to Plaintiff)(kah) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Mary Jane Bester. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (kah) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Mary Jane Bester. (kah) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Walmart, Walmart.com filed by Mary Jane Bester. Jury Demand. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge David E Jones. (kah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
