Bartlett v. Penzone
Petitioner: Alan M Bartlett
Respondent: Paul Penzone
Case Number: 2:2018cv01854
Filed: November 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William E Duffin
Referring Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2019 Filing 12 REQUEST by Alan M Bartlett for Transcripts on Appeal. (NOTE: No hearings were held so no transcripts can be prepared.) (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(kwb)
December 17, 2018 Filing 11 USCA Case Number 18-3651 re: #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Alan M Bartlett. (jv)
December 17, 2018 Filing 10 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #7 Notice of Appeal (jv)
December 17, 2018 Filing 9 Pro Se Cover Letter re: #7 Notice of Appeal (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet)(jv)
December 14, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appeal Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Alan M Bartlett. (jv)
December 14, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee and document #5 by Alan M Bartlett. (cc: all counsel) (jv)
December 10, 2018 Filing 6 OBJECTIONS by Alan M Bartlett re #5 Report and Recommendations. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Certificate of Service)(asc)
November 28, 2018 Filing 5 ...(continued from ECF No #4 ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 11/28/2018 re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Alan M Bartlett RECOMMENDING that Bartlett's petition and this action be dismissed. Written objections to any recommendation herein or part thereof may be filed within fourteen days of service of this recommendation. (cc: all counsel - via US Mail to Petitioner)(lz)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 11/28/2018 GRANTING #2 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (continued below)... (cc: all counsel - via US Mail to Petitioner) (lz)
November 28, 2018 Case Reassigned to Judge J P Stadtmueller. Magistrate Judge William E Duffin no longer assigned to the case. (lz)
November 27, 2018 Docket Annotation - Docket sheet mailed to petitioner. (lz)
November 26, 2018 Filing 3 NON CONFORMING Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Alan M Bartlett. (lz)
November 26, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Alan M Bartlett. (lz)
November 26, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC § 1651 filed by Alan M Bartlett. (Filing Fee NOT PAID $5) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Proof of Service)(lz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bartlett v. Penzone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alan M Bartlett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Paul Penzone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?