Gatlin v. Berryhill
| Latasha Gatlin |
| Nancy A Berryhill |
| 2:2018cv01871 |
| November 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William C Griesbach |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 12/17/2018 (Amended Complaint). (mac) |
| Filing 10 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Nancy A Berryhill. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
| Filing 9 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/6/2018 (Amended Complaint). (mac) |
| Filing 8 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiffs brief due 3/18/19; Defendants response due 4/26/19; Plaintiffs reply due 5/13/19. (cc: all counsel) (lh) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; by Nancy A Berryhill Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/4/18. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Latasha Gatlin. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Dreis, David) |
| Transmit #5 Amended Complaint and Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF (mac) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Nancy A Berryhill filed by Latasha Gatlin.(Dreis, David) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 11/28/2018 Granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
| Transmit Complaint and Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF (mac) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Latasha Gatlin. (Dreis, David) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Latasha Gatlin. (Dreis, David) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Latasha Gatlin (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dreis, David) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge William C Griesbach ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Jones to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gatlin v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Latasha Gatlin | |
| Represented By: | David G Dreis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
