McNeal v. Pollard
| Joel McNeal |
| Warden Scott Eckstein and William J Pollard |
| 2:2018cv01966 |
| December 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| David E Jones |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 LETTER from Joel McNeal regarding correct name of Respondent. (mac) |
| Filing 6 LETTER from the Clerk to Joel McNeal regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (cc: All Counsel) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet)(tlf) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Joel McNeal. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (amb) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge J P Stadtmueller. Magistrate Judge David E Jones no longer assigned to the case. (amb) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to petitioner re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Jones and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days (jcl) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Joel McNeal. (jcl) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Joel McNeal. (jcl) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joel McNeal. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
