Morales v. Rauch
Marlo U Morales |
Dr Rauch and Dr Chris J Rauch |
2:2018cv01967 |
December 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
David E Jones |
Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (amb) |
Filing 13 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Chris J Rauch. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Al-Homsi, Hector) |
NOTICE from the clerk to defendant requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge David E. Jones be filed within 21 days; the form is available at the court's web site: www.wied.uscourts.gov (amb) |
Filing 12 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY DOJ as to Dr Rauch (Al-Homsi, Hector) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Hector S Al-Homsi on behalf of Dr Rauch. Attorney(s) appearing: Hector Al-Homsi (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Al-Homsi, Hector) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Order remaining payment be taken out of release account by Marlo Morales. (amb) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge David E Jones on 01/16/2019. IT IS ORDERED that Morales's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee (ECF No. #3 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of plaintiff's complaint and this order are being electronically sent today to the Wisconsin Department of Justice for service on the state defendant Dr. Ranch. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that the defendant Dr. Ranch shall file a responsive pleading to the complaint within sixty days of receiving electronic notice of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having custody Morales shall collect from his institution trust account the $343.75 balance of the filing fee by collecting monthly payments from Morales' prison trust account. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may not begin discovery until after the court enters a scheduling order setting deadlines for discovery and dispositive motions. (cc: all counsel, via US Mail to plaintiff and warden) (amb) |
Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Marlo U Morales. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (amb) |
Filing 7 LETTER from plaintiff re: mail and filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(amb) |
INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $6.25, receipt number MK4689-075793. ; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department (jcl) |
Filing 6 LETTER from plaintiff re: payment of filing fee. (amb) |
Filing 5 ORDER that on or before 1/4/2019 plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $ 6.25 as an initial partial filing fee in this action signed by Magistrate Judge David E Jones on 12/14/18. (cc: all counsel -via US Mail to Plaintiff, Warden at RCI)(kah) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Marlo U Morales. (kah) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Marlo U Morales. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kah) |
Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Jones and requesting that the consent/refusal form, the a Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Filing Fee and six month trust account statement be filed within 21 days (jcl) (Main Document 2 replaced on 12/12/2018) (jcl). |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against Dr Rauch by Marlo U Morales. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.