Wilson v. Milwaukee County Jail et al
Genis Jamonte Wilson |
Scott F Anderson, Judge Joseph Walh, Milwaukee County Jail, Richard Schmidt and Joseph Wall |
2:2018cv02031 |
December 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
J P Stadtmueller |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Genis Jamonte Wilson. (blr) |
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Genis Jamonte Wilson. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (blr) |
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Genis Jamonte Wilson. (mac) |
![]() |
Filing 4 LETTER from Genis Wilson. (mac) |
Filing 3 LETTER from the Clerk to Genis Jamonte Wilson regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (cc: All Counsel) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet)(tlf) |
Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge David E. Jones and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting payment of the filing fee or that an IFP and certified trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (blr) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Genis Jamonte Wilson. (blr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.