Smith v. Jensen et al
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Smith
Defendant: HSW Marchant, RN Jensen, Dr Manlove and RN Vick
Case Number: 2:2019cv00262
Filed: February 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: David E Jones
Referring Judge: Pamela Pepper
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2019 INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $2.22, receipt number MK4689-076670. ; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department (bx)
February 28, 2019 Case reassigned to Judge Pamela Pepper. Magistrate Judge David E Jones no longer assigned to the case due to non-consent (copy mailed to Plaintiff). (kah)
February 27, 2019 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Nathaniel Smith. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (cms)
February 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that on or before 3/14/19 plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $ 2.22 as an initial partial filing fee in this action signed by Magistrate Judge David E Jones on 2/21/19. (cc: all counsel - via US Mail to Plaintiff and Warden, WCI)(kah)
February 20, 2019 Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff requesting that the consent/refusal form to Magistrate Judge David E Jones be filed within 21 days. (kah)
February 19, 2019 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Nathaniel Smith. (kah)
February 19, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Nathaniel Smith. (kah)
February 19, 2019 Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against RN Jensen, Dr Manlove, HSW Marchant, RN Vick by Nathaniel Smith. (kah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Jensen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HSW Marchant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RN Jensen
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr Manlove
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RN Vick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?