Vaserman v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Mikhail Leonidovich Vaserman
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2019cv00267
Filed: February 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Referring Judge: Nancy Joseph
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2019 Filing 10 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 2/26/2019. (blr)
March 4, 2019 Filing 9 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 3/1/2019. (blr)
February 28, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Skutch Cohn on behalf of Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Attorney(s) appearing: Emily S. Cohn (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Cohn, Emily)
February 27, 2019 Filing 7 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiff's brief due June 10, 2019; Defendant's response due July 22, 2019; Plaintiff's reply due August 6, 2019. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Plaintiff) (blr)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 2/26/19. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph for all further proceedings. Judge Lynn Adelman no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff)(jad)
February 25, 2019 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
February 22, 2019 Transmit #1 Complaint and #4 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr)
February 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 2/21/19 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff) (jad)
February 20, 2019 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Vaserman Mikhail Leonidovich. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (asc)
February 20, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Vaserman Mikhail Leonidovich. (asc)
February 20, 2019 Filing 1 PRO SE SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Vaserman Mikhail Leonidovich ;Consent forms distributed to the parties for Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph (asc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vaserman v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mikhail Leonidovich Vaserman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Emily Skutch Cohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?