Gardipee v. Carr et al
Richard Thomas Gardipee |
Kevin Carr and Wisconsin Department of Corrections |
2:2019cv00666 |
May 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Lynn Adelman |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron R O'Neil on behalf of Kevin Carr. Attorney(s) appearing: Aaron R. O'Neil (O'Neil, Aaron) |
Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY DOJ as to Kevin Carr (Burgundy, Sarah) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 6/11/19 that within 60 days of the date of this order respondent either answer the petition, complying with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases, or file a dispositive motion. (cc: all counsel, petitioner)(jad) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of case opening in the USCA of a Writ of Procedendo by Richard Gardipee. (kmm) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Richard Thomas Gardipee. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (cav) |
Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to Richard Gardipee re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge David E Jones and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (mac) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Richard Thomas Gardipee. (Filing Fee PAID $5) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 (Incorrect) Consent Form)(mac) |
FILING FEE Received: $5, receipt number GB4689005437. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.