Johnson v. Fidelity Capital Holdings Inc
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Pielarz Johnson
Defendant: Fidelity Capital Holdings Inc
Case Number: 2:2019cv00722
Filed: May 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Pamela Pepper
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 5/15/2019 re #3 Plaintiff's Rule 7(h) Expedited, Non-Dispositive Motion for Class Certification and Relief from Memorandum, Supporting Documents, and Automatic Briefing Requirements. The court GRANTS the plaintiff's motion to stay the class certification motion until an amended motion for class certification is filed. The court further GRANTS the plaintiff's motion asking for a relief from the automatic briefing schedule required by the local rules for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. The court ORDERS that the plaintiff's motion for class certification isTERMINATED for administrative purposes; the court will regard the motion as pending to serve its protective purpose under Damasco v. Clear Wire Corp. Note: there is no document associated with this text only order. (cc: all counsel) (cb)
May 15, 2019 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand against Fidelity Capital Holdings Inc filed by Elizabeth Pielarz Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff)(Blythin, John)
May 15, 2019 Summons Issued as to Fidelity Capital Holdings Inc. (vkb)
May 14, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Fulton Dental / Damasco), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion to certify class until the scheduling conference, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from the Local Rules setting automatic briefing schedules and requiring briefs and supporting material to be filed with the motion (Civil L.R. 7(a), 7(d)) by Elizabeth Pielarz Johnson. (Blythin, John)
May 14, 2019 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Elizabeth Pielarz Johnson. (Blythin, John)
May 14, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Fidelity Capital Holdings Inc by Elizabeth Pielarz Johnson. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3109857) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons on Defendant)(Blythin, John)
May 14, 2019 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Jones to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Fidelity Capital Holdings Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Pielarz Johnson
Represented By: John D Blythin
Represented By: Ben J Slatky
Represented By: Jesse Fruchter
Represented By: Denise L Morris
Represented By: Mark A Eldridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fidelity Capital Holdings Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?