Darrow v. Cross et al
| Ricky J Darrow |
| University of Wisconsin System, Raymond Cross and UWSA Whitewater |
| 2:2019cv00797 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Nancy Joseph |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
LETTER re case filed by Ricky J Darrow. (asc)
|
|
Filing 5
TRANSMIT #4 Order, #1 Complaint, Notice, Waiver and Consent Form to USMS for service upon defendants. (blr)
|
|
Filing 4
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee (Docket #2 ) is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), the U.S. Marshals Service shall serve a copy of the complaint, a waiver of service form and/or the summons, and this order upon the defendants. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff) (asc)
|
|
Filing 3
LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (ds)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Ricky J Darrow. (ds)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Ricky J Darrow. (ds)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
