Robinson v. Lucas
Plaintiff: Anthony Duane Robinson
Defendant: Sheriff Earnell Lucas
Case Number: 2:2019cv00812
Filed: May 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2019 NOTICE from the clerk to DEFENDANT requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin be filed within 21 days; the form is available at the court's web site: www.wied.uscourts.gov (blr)
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCREENING ORDER re #1 Plaintiff's Complaint signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 7/12/2019. #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee is GRANTED; agency having custody of Plaintiff to COLLECT the balance of the filing fee in accordance with this Order. Plaintiff is PERMITTED to proceed on a claim of cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Copies of Plaintiff's Complaint and this Order to be electronically SENT to Milwaukee County for service on Defendant, who shall FILE a responsive pleading within 60 days. See Order. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Anthony Duane Robinson and Warden at Dodge Correctional Institution) (jm)
July 8, 2019 INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $20.92, receipt number MK4689-078581. ; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department. (ds)
June 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 6/18/2019 ORDERING that on or before 7/9/2019, Plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $20.92 as an initial partial filing fee in this action. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Anthony Duane Robinson and Warden at Dodge Correctional Institution)(jm)
June 12, 2019 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Anthony Duane Robinson. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (asc)
June 12, 2019 Filing 5 LETTER re trust account statement from plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(asc)
May 31, 2019 Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (ds)
May 30, 2019 Filing 3 PARTIAL Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Anthony Duane Robinson. (ds)
May 30, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Anthony Duane Robinson. (ds)
May 30, 2019 Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against Earnell Lucas by Anthony Duane Robinson. (ds)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Lucas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff Earnell Lucas
Represented By: Milwaukee County - 550, 555
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Duane Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?