Stechauner v. Jess et al
| Matthew C Stechauner |
| Cathy Jess, Judy Smith, Eric Toney, Officer Offerman, Jane and John Does, Henslin, Skinner, Dr Phillip Wheatley, Psychologist Supervisor Adams, Program Supervisor Feltes and Natasha Brozovic |
| 2:2019cv00833 |
| June 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William E Duffin |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCREENING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 7/26/2019. The plaintiff Matthew C. Stechauner's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Stechauner's motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. #4 ) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Stechauner may file an amended complaint that complies with the instructions in this order. If Stechauner chooses to file an amended complaint, he must do so by August 26, 2019. If Stechauner files an amended complaint by the deadline, the court will screen the amended complaint as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915A. If Stechauner does not file an amended complaint by the deadline, the court will dismiss this case without prejudice. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff with complaint form, Warden) (mlm)
|
| INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $1.02, receipt number MK4689-078368. ; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department (jcl) |
| Filing 12 LETTER from the Clerk to Matthew C Stechauner regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (cc: All Counsel) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet)(tlf) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 6/13/2019, that on or before 7/5/2019 plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $ 1.02 as an initial partial filing fee in this action. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff, Warden)(mlm)
|
| Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Matthew C Stechauner. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(mac) |
| Filing 9 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Matthew C Stechauner. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (mlm) |
| Filing 8 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (ds) |
| Filing 7 DECLARATION of David Satorius in Support of Matthew C. Stechauner 1983 Civil Complaint, Counsel Motion, Declaration, Memorandum of Law. (ds) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Plaintiff Matthew C. Stechauner in Support of Counsel Motion. (ds) |
| Filing 5 BRIEF in Support filed by Matthew C Stechauner re #4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. (ds) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Matthew C Stechauner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(ds) |
| Filing 3 PARTIAL Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Matthew C Stechauner. (ds) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Matthew C Stechauner. (ds) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Matthew C Stechauner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(ds) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/4/2019: #2 Cover Letter)ds. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
