Rozani v. Webcollex LLC
Julian Rozani |
Webcollex LLC |
2:2019cv00980 |
July 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
David E Jones |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Webcollex LLC - Waiver sent on 9/4/2019. (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge David E Jones on 7/25/2018. For the reasons stated therein, and for good cause shown, the plaintiff's motion to stay her motion for class certification, ECF No. #3 , and motion for relief from the Local Rules setting an automatic briefing schedule, ECF No. #3 , are GRANTED. The plaintiff's motion for class certification, ECF No. #3 , is TERMINATED for administrative purposes only. Briefing on the plaintiff's class cert motion is STAYED until the date to be set at the Rule 16 scheduling conference. NOTE: There is no document attached to this text-only order. (cc: all counsel) (jh) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Julian Rozani. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Eldridge, Mark) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge David E Jones on 7/12/19. Plaintiff must file proof of service of the complaint/petition or a report on the status of service for each defendant within 45 days of the date of this order. Please note that there is no document attached to this order. (cc: all counsel)(kah) |
Summons Issued as to Webcollex LLC. (kah) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from memorandum, supporting documents, and automatic briefing requirements, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion for class certification until the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference by Julian Rozani. (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Julian Rozani. (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Webcollex LLC by Julian Rozani. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3157140) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Eldridge, Mark) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge David E Jones ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Jones to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rozani v. Webcollex LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Webcollex LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Julian Rozani | |
Represented By: | Mark A Eldridge |
Represented By: | Jesse Fruchter |
Represented By: | John D Blythin |
Represented By: | Ben J Slatky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.