Rousseau v. Midwest Fidelity Services LLC
| Deanna M Rousseau |
| Midwest Fidelity Services LLC |
| 2:2019cv00994 |
| July 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| David E Jones |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Deanna M Rousseau. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Deanna M Rousseau. Midwest Fidelity Services LLC served on 7/23/2019. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Deanna M Rousseau. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Summons Issued as to Midwest Fidelity Services LLC. (kah) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Deanna M Rousseau (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE Statement by Deanna M. Rousseau. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis on behalf of Deanna M. Rousseau. Attorney(s) appearing: Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan C Volheim on behalf of Deanna M. Rousseau. Attorney(s) appearing: Nathan C. Volheim (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Midwest Fidelity Services, LLC by Deanna M. Rousseau. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3159734) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Volheim, Nathan) |
| Case Opening Modification(s); The following modification(s) have been made to your case entry: One or more party names have been modified - please remember to follow the Party Name Guidelines found on our website. The attached summons was not prepared using the version found on our website or was not saved properly - please follow the instructions and RESUBMIT the summons using the event Request for Issuance of Summons which is found under the heading other documents. ; Please refer to the # attorney case opening instructions, the # summons instructions and the # party name guidelines found in the user manual for further guidance (kah) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge David E Jones ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Jones to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (ds) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rousseau v. Midwest Fidelity Services LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Midwest Fidelity Services LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Deanna M Rousseau | |
| Represented By: | Nathan C Volheim |
| Represented By: | Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
