Olsen v. Saul

Plaintiff: Matthew John Olsen
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Case Number: 2:2019cv01114
Filed: August 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2019 Filing 10 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 9/3/2019. By 10/4/2019, Defendant to serve on Plaintiff copy of proposed Notice of Mailing and Preservation of Rights and copy of the transcript of administrative proceedings. By 10/18/2019, parties to meet and confer in good faith effort to resolve matter. Plaintiff's brief due by 12/17/2019; Defendant's response due by 2/17/2020; Plaintiff's reply due by 3/2/2020. Briefs are subject to specified page limitations. No extensions of time for filing of briefs will be granted. (cc: all counsel)(jm)
August 30, 2019 Filing 9 PROPOSED Briefing Schedule filed by Andrew M Saul. (Godfrey, Jean)
August 30, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jean Marie Godfrey on behalf of Andrew M Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Jean Godfrey (Godfrey, Jean)
August 19, 2019 Filing 7 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; by Matthew John Olsen Office of Regional Chief Counsel SSA served on August 12 2019. (Angermeier, Vincent)
August 14, 2019 Filing 6 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; by Matthew John Olsen US Attorney served on August 9 2019. (Angermeier, Vincent)
August 12, 2019 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
August 9, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Matthew John Olsen (Angermeier, Vincent)
August 2, 2019 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Matthew John Olsen. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Angermeier, Vincent)
August 2, 2019 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Matthew John Olsen. (Angermeier, Vincent)
August 2, 2019 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Matthew John Olsen ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3179022) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit ALJ Denial, #3 Exhibit AC Denial)(Angermeier, Vincent)
August 2, 2019 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge J P Stadtmueller ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Jones to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Olsen v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew John Olsen
Represented By: Vincent R Angermeier
Represented By: Robert C Angermeier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Represented By: Jean Marie Godfrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?