Black v. Wissen Infotech Inc
Adam Black |
Wissen Infotech, Inc. and Wissen Infotech Inc |
2:2019cv01131 |
August 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Pamela Pepper |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adam Black. Wissen Infotech Inc served on 9/18/2019. (Luzi, Scott) |
Filing 5 Waiver of Service Returned Unexecuted as to Wissen Infotech Inc. filed by Adam Black. (Luzi, Scott) |
Summons Issued as to Wissen Infotech Inc. (amb) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Adam Black. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Luzi, Scott) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott S Luzi on behalf of Adam Black. Attorney(s) appearing: Scott S. Luzi, James A. Walcheske (Luzi, Scott) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Adam Black. (Luzi, Scott) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Wissen Infotech, Inc. by Adam Black. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3181458) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Luzi, Scott) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Jones to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website. (ds) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.