Rodz v. Midwest Receivable Solutions LLC
| Paula Rodz |
| Midwest Receivable Solutions LLC |
| 2:2019cv01191 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| William E Duffin |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/10/19 granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Midwest Receivable Solutions LLC answer is due 10/21/2019. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie A Strickler on behalf of Midwest Receivable Solutions LLC. Attorney(s) appearing: Stephanie A. Strickler (Strickler, Stephanie) |
| Case reassigned to Judge Lynn Adelman. Magistrate Judge William E Duffin no longer assigned to the case. (mlm) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Midwest Receivable Solutions LLC. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Strickler, Nicole) |
| NOTICE from the clerk to Defendant requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin be filed within 21 days; the form is available at the court's web site: www.wied.uscourts.gov (mlm) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Midwest Receivable Solutions LLC. (Strickler, Nicole) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole M Strickler on behalf of Midwest Receivable Solutions LLC. Attorney(s) appearing: Nicole Strickler (Strickler, Nicole) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 8/27/2019. The plaintiff's motion to stay further proceedings on the motion for class certification is granted. The parties are relieved from the automatic briefing schedule set forth in Civil Local Rule 7(b) and (c). Moreover, for administrative purposes, it is necessary that the Clerk terminate the plaintiff's motion for class certification. However, this motion will be regarded as pending to serve its protective purpose under Damasco. (cc: all counsel) (mlm)
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Paula Rodz. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Summons Issued as to Midwest Receivable Solutions LLC. (mlm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from memorandum, supporting documents, and automatic briefing requirements, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion for class certification until the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference by Paula Rodz. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Paula Rodz. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Midwest Receivable Solutions LLC by Paula Rodz. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3191771) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Eldridge, Mark) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin. Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (ds) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
