King v. Olmsted et al
Marvell King |
Jonathan Nitti and Stephanie Olmsted |
2:2019cv01295 |
September 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Lynn Adelman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/29/2019. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff)(lls) |
|
Filing 9 LETTER from Marvell King. (lh) |
INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $3.97, receipt number MK4689-079927. ; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department. (ds) |
|
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Marvell King. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (jcl) |
|
Filing 5 LETTER from the Clerk to Marvell King regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (cc: All Counsel) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet)(tlf) |
Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to Marvell King re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin David E Jones< and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (mac) Modified on 9/10/2019 (jcl). |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Marvell King. (mac) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Marvell King. (mac) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against All Defendants by Marvell King. (mac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.