Wood v. Windham Professionals Inc
| Elizabeth Wood |
| Windham Professionals Inc |
| 2:2019cv01329 |
| September 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Elizabeth Wood. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 4
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/16/2019 re #3 Plaintiff's Rule 7(h) Expedited, Non-Dispositive Motion for Class Certification and Relief from Memorandum, Supporting Documents, and Automatic Briefing Requirements. The court GRANTS the plaintiff's motion to stay the class certification motion until an amended motion for class certification is filed. The court further GRANTS the plaintiff's motion asking for relief from the automatic briefing schedule required by the local rules for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. The court ORDERS that the plaintiff's motion for class certification is TERMINATED for administrative purposes; the court will regard the motion as pending to preserve its protective purpose under Damasco v. Clear Wire Corp. Note: there is no document associated with this text only order. (cc: all counsel) (cb)
|
| Summons Issued as to Windham Professionals Inc. (amb) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from memorandum, supporting documents, and automatic briefing requirements, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion for class certification until the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference by Elizabeth Wood. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Elizabeth Wood. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Windham Professionals Inc by Elizabeth Wood. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3215849) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Eldridge, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wood v. Windham Professionals Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Windham Professionals Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elizabeth Wood | |
| Represented By: | Mark A Eldridge |
| Represented By: | Jesse Fruchter |
| Represented By: | John D Blythin |
| Represented By: | Ben J Slatky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
